Skip to content
Learn · Guide · Comparison

Which AI should you use?

A practical comparison of the major AI assistants and model families: the frontier chatbots (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok), the answer engines and Copilots, and the open-weight and emerging models (Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM, and more). What each is best at, what they cost, and how to choose.

The short answer

There is no single best AI assistant. The right choice depends on your task, your budget, and your data-governance needs. Most options split into two camps: closed models you use as a hosted product or API (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, the Copilots, and cloud families like Amazon Nova), and open-weight models you can also download and self-host (Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, and emerging labs such as Kimi, GLM, MiniMax, Jamba, Granite, and Falcon).

This guide compares them side by side on what they're genuinely good at, then gives a plain decision rule for each. Use the table to scan, and the 'pick this if' notes to decide.

At a glance

The lineup, side by side

All prices are approximate and as of the date below. Always confirm on the provider's site.

ClaudeAnthropic
Best at
Coding, careful reasoning, long-form writing
Pricing
Free tier; Pro ~$20/mo; API per token
Open weights
No
ChatGPTOpenAI
Best at
All-round generalist, widest feature set, images & voice
Pricing
Free tier; Plus ~$20/mo; API per token
Open weights
No
GeminiGoogle
Best at
Huge context, multimodal, Google Workspace
Pricing
Free tier; Pro ~$20/mo; API per token
Open weights
No
GrokxAI
Best at
Real-time X data, blunt tone
Pricing
Free in X; SuperGrok ~$30/mo; API
Open weights
No
MistralMistral AI (France)
Best at
Self-hosting, cost-efficiency, EU data option
Pricing
Open weights free; Le Chat Pro ~$15/mo; API
Open weights
Yes
DeepSeekDeepSeek (China)
Best at
Low-cost reasoning, open weights
Pricing
Open weights free; very cheap API
Open weights
Yes
QwenAlibaba (China)
Best at
Range of sizes, multilingual, open weights
Pricing
Open weights free; API per token
Open weights
Yes
PerplexityPerplexity AI
Best at
Cited web research, real-time answers
Pricing
Free tier; Pro ~$20/mo; Sonar API
Open weights
No
LlamaMeta
Best at
Self-hosting, on-device, fine-tuning
Pricing
Open weights free; hosted APIs per token
Open weights
Yes
Microsoft CopilotMicrosoft
Best at
Microsoft 365 & Windows, work-data grounding
Pricing
Free tier; Pro ~$20/mo; M365 Copilot ~$30/user/mo
Open weights
No
GitHub CopilotGitHub / Microsoft
Best at
In-editor coding: completion & agents
Pricing
Free tier; Pro ~$10/mo; Business per user
Open weights
No
KimiMoonshot AI (China)
Best at
Long context, agentic & coding (open-weight K2)
Pricing
Free app; open weights free; low-cost API
Open weights
Partial
Cohere CommandCohere (Canada)
Best at
Enterprise RAG, private cloud deployment, multilingual
Pricing
Free trial; API per token; private deploy custom
Open weights
No
ErnieBaidu (China)
Best at
Chinese-language & multimodal, Baidu ecosystem
Pricing
Free app; open weights (4.5) free; API per token
Open weights
Partial
DoubaoByteDance (China)
Best at
Very low-cost high-volume, multimodal (Chinese market)
Pricing
Free app; very cheap API via Volcano Engine
Open weights
No
MiniMaxMiniMax (China)
Best at
Long context plus audio & video generation
Pricing
Open-weight text free; API per token/unit
Open weights
Partial
GLM (Z.ai)Zhipu AI (China)
Best at
Agentic & coding, self-hostable open weights
Pricing
Free app; open weights free; low-cost API
Open weights
Yes
Amazon NovaAmazon
Best at
Cost-efficient models inside AWS Bedrock
Pricing
Usage-based on Bedrock; cheap lower tiers
Open weights
No
JambaAI21 Labs (Israel)
Best at
Efficient very long context (hybrid Mamba-Transformer)
Pricing
Open weights free; API per token
Open weights
Yes
GraniteIBM
Best at
Governed enterprise use, code, Apache-2.0 open weights
Pricing
Open weights free; watsonx usage-based
Open weights
Yes
FalconTII (UAE)
Best at
Permissive open weights from a non-US, non-China lab
Pricing
Open weights free; hosted via third parties
Open weights
Yes
Decide

Which one is right for you?

A plain decision rule for each. Most teams end up using two or three.

Pick Claude if…

Your work is coding, careful analysis, or writing that has to keep your voice. It's the strongest default for engineering and for tasks where being right beats sounding confident.

Read the Claude guide

Pick ChatGPT if…

You want one tool that does a bit of everything (text, images, voice, data analysis, custom assistants) with the largest ecosystem and the most help available online.

Read the ChatGPT guide

Pick Gemini if…

You live in Google Workspace, or you need to reason over very large documents, long videos, or mixed media in a single prompt.

Read the Gemini guide

Pick Grok if…

You need a read on what's being said right now on X, or you prefer a blunter, more casual tone, and you'll verify anything important.

Read the Grok guide

Pick Mistral if…

You want to self-host a capable model, care about cost-efficiency, or need a European, vendor-independent option with strong small models.

Read the Mistral guide

Pick DeepSeek if…

Cost is the dominant constraint and you want strong open-weight reasoning, ideally self-hosted given the data-governance questions around its hosted service.

Read the DeepSeek guide

Pick Qwen if…

You want open weights with a size for every job and strong multilingual coverage, self-hosted for data-sensitive work.

Read the Qwen guide

Pick Perplexity if…

You mainly need current, sourced answers (research, fact-finding, comparisons) rather than open-ended chat or content generation. It cites everything, so you can verify before you act.

Read the Perplexity guide

Pick Llama if…

You want to own the model that runs your product (self-hosted, on-device, or fine-tuned) with the largest open ecosystem behind it and no per-token vendor bill.

Read the Llama guide

Pick Microsoft Copilot if…

Your organization runs on Microsoft 365 and you want an assistant that drafts in Office and answers over your own emails, files, and meetings with enterprise data protection.

Read the Microsoft Copilot guide

Pick GitHub Copilot if…

You write code and want AI help in your editor (inline completion, chat about your repo, and an agent that makes multi-file changes) across VS Code, JetBrains, and GitHub.

Read the GitHub Copilot guide

Pick Kimi if…

You reason over very long documents or want capable open weights for agentic and coding work (Kimi K2) you can self-host, and you've thought through the data-governance side of a China-based service.

Read the Kimi guide

Pick Cohere Command if…

You're an enterprise that wants grounded answers over your own documents (RAG) and the option to deploy the model privately inside your own cloud, rather than a public chatbot.

Read the Cohere Command guide

Pick Ernie if…

Your work is Chinese-language or China-market, you want Baidu ecosystem integration, or you want to self-host the open-weight ERNIE 4.5 models.

Read the Ernie guide

Pick Doubao if…

You need very low-cost, high-volume hosted inference in the Chinese market and don't require self-hosting, with multimodal voice and image features.

Read the Doubao guide

Pick MiniMax if…

You want long context together with strong audio and video generation from one provider, with an open-weight text model you can self-host.

Read the MiniMax guide

Pick GLM (Z.ai) if…

You want capable open weights for agentic and coding work that you can self-host, from a lab with a strong recent track record on those tasks.

Read the GLM (Z.ai) guide

Pick Amazon Nova if…

Your stack is on AWS and you want cost-efficient models inside Bedrock, with native retrieval, agents, and guardrails and your data staying in your AWS account.

Read the Amazon Nova guide

Pick Jamba if…

Long-context efficiency is the priority and you want open weights from a Western lab, with a hybrid architecture that keeps large inputs cheaper to run.

Read the Jamba guide

Pick Granite if…

You need open, Apache-2.0 licensed models with documented provenance for a regulated or enterprise deployment, ideally self-hosted or run on watsonx.

Read the Granite guide

Pick Falcon if…

You want permissively licensed open weights you can self-host and fine-tune, sourced from a lab outside the US and China.

Read the Falcon guide
How to choose

How to think about choosing

Start with the task. Coding and careful reasoning point one way; live information or a Google-centric workflow point another; high-volume, cost-driven, or data-sensitive work points toward open weights you can host.

Then weigh three constraints: cost (per-token API price, or compute if you self-host), data governance (where your data goes and who can see it), and ecosystem (the tools and apps you already use).

Most teams end up using two or three: a frontier model for hard problems, and a cheap or self-hosted open model for high-volume tasks.

How to choose

A note on the open-weight and China-based models

Mistral, DeepSeek, and Qwen can all be downloaded and run on your own infrastructure, which is attractive for cost, latency, and keeping data in your environment.

DeepSeek and Qwen are made in China; their hosted apps and APIs run on China-based infrastructure and apply local content rules. For sensitive or regulated North-American data, prefer self-hosting their open weights over the hosted services, or use a Western provider.

FAQ

Choosing an AI
common questions.

Direct answers to the questions we get asked the most. If yours isn't covered, write to the team.

Work with SDEN

Not sure which to build on?

We help teams pick the right models for the job and ship them securely, including self-hosted open models when data governance demands it.

Which AI should you use? · SDEN